The Corrupt Attorneys
Home

The RULES of the Florida Bar for Attorneys

Attorneys are REQUIRED to be honest
 

RULE 4-4.1 TRUTHFULNESS IN STATEMENTS TO OTHERS

In the course of representing a client a lawyer shall not knowingly:

(a) make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person; or

(b) fail to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client, unless disclosure is prohibited by rule 4-1.6.

Comment

Misrepresentation

A lawyer is required to be truthful when dealing with others on a client's behalf, but generally has no affirmative duty to inform an opposing party of relevant facts. A misrepresentation can occur if the lawyer incorporates or affirms a statement of another person that the lawyer knows is false. Misrepresentations can also occur by failure to act.

Statements of fact

This rule refers to statements of fact. Whether a particular statement should be regarded as one of fact can depend on the circumstances. Under generally accepted conventions in negotiation, certain types of statements ordinarily are not taken as statements of material fact. Estimates of price or value placed on the subject of a transaction and a party's intentions as to an acceptable settlement of a claim are in this category, and so is the existence of an undisclosed principal except where nondisclosure of the principal would constitute fraud.

Fraud by client

Subdivision (b) recognizes that substantive law may require a lawyer to disclose certain information to avoid being deemed to have assisted the client's crime or fraud. The requirement of disclosure created by this subdivision is, however, subject to the obligations created by rule 4-1.6.

An Attorney should not engage in dishonest conduct, fraud, deceit, or anything prejudicial to justice.

RULE 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT

A lawyer shall not:

(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;

(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;

(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;

(d) engage in conduct in connection with the practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, including to knowingly, or through callous indifference, disparage, humiliate, or discriminate against litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers on any basis, including, but not limited to, on account of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, or physical characteristic;

IN THIS CASE THE LAW FIRM OF RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL HAVE BEEN EVERYTHING BUT HONEST!!!

When they were given evidence that their client had committed perjury they hid the perjury from the Court and actually lied in Court Documents denying the perjury.

RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL knew that the victim was entitled to his money back, pursuant to the Florida Lemon Law, since their client's perjury was the ONLY factor that kept the victim from getting his money back.

Yet RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL decided to be dishonest, to violate the Rules of the Florida Bar, and to cover up the perjury by their client, by denying it, as part of a scheme to steal the victim's money.

The management in RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL were made fully aware of the illegal conduct of their law firm by the Disabled Veteran-Victim and THEY have remained silent, which makes them guilty too.

RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL have a history of being "less then idea lawyers" and the Florida Supreme Court, in a rare move, actually ORDERED an investigation of their law firm by the Florida Bar.

 


RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL are investigated at the request of the Florida Supreme Court.

Law Firm of RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL are investigated in possible leak of a Florida Supreme Court Ruling

Florida Supreme Court Says Ruling Was Not Leaked, to Uphold the Intergity of their Court, HOWEVER a Settlement was Reached Right Before the Decision Came Down, and RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL did have an Employee Receive E-Mails from an Employee at the Florida Supreme Court

From my personal experience in dealing with the law firm of RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL I can state that I have found them to be extremely dishonest, misusing the Florida Legal System to wrongly steal money from me, thousands that I paid for a junk Chevy S-10.
 
I KNOW they lie to the Courts and cover up perjury. I KNOW they misrepresent case law, and use legal trickery, and techinicalities to make sure JUSTICE IS NOT DONE, and to help their client, in my case, steal in direct violation of Chapter 681.
 
Based on my knowledge of how dishonest RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL are I personally believe they are not as innocent as they claim in the Supreme Court Leak.
 
That however is my own personal belief, based on my personally knowing that they lied, and hid the crime of perjury in my case.
 
I can truthfully say that in my 56 years I have never known any company even close to as dishonest as the law firm of RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL are, other then maybe the conduct of General Motors in this case.
 
Honest Attorneys would have told their client that it is illegal to lie, under oath, and promptly advised the Court of their client's perjury.
 
Honest Attorneys would have told their client to give back the money they stole. 

If you, or someone you know, is a victim of the General Motors Rip Off, or if you just want to help, please go to our "What You Can Do" page.
 
There is a Guest Book on our Links Page. Please visit it.