|
Attorneys are REQUIRED to be honest
RULE 4-4.1 TRUTHFULNESS IN STATEMENTS TO OTHERS
In
the course of representing a client a lawyer shall not knowingly:
(a) make a false statement of material fact
or law to a third person; or
(b) fail to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary
to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client, unless disclosure is prohibited by rule 4-1.6.
Comment
Misrepresentation
A
lawyer is required to be truthful when dealing with others on a client's behalf, but generally has no affirmative duty to
inform an opposing party of relevant facts. A misrepresentation can occur if the lawyer incorporates or affirms a statement
of another person that the lawyer knows is false. Misrepresentations can also occur by failure to act.
Statements
of fact
This rule refers to statements of fact. Whether a particular statement should be regarded as one of fact
can depend on the circumstances. Under generally accepted conventions in negotiation, certain types of statements ordinarily
are not taken as statements of material fact. Estimates of price or value placed on the subject of a transaction and a party's
intentions as to an acceptable settlement of a claim are in this category, and so is the existence of an undisclosed principal
except where nondisclosure of the principal would constitute fraud.
Fraud by client
Subdivision (b) recognizes
that substantive law may require a lawyer to disclose certain information to avoid being deemed to have assisted the client's
crime or fraud. The requirement of disclosure created by this subdivision is, however, subject to the obligations created
by rule 4-1.6.
An Attorney should not engage in dishonest conduct,
fraud, deceit, or anything prejudicial to justice.
RULE 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT
A lawyer shall not:
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional
Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) commit a criminal act
that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) engage
in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;
(d) engage in conduct in connection with the
practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, including to knowingly, or through callous indifference,
disparage, humiliate, or discriminate against litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers on any basis,
including, but not limited to, on account of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status,
sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, or physical characteristic;
IN THIS CASE THE LAW FIRM OF RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL
HAVE BEEN EVERYTHING BUT HONEST!!!
When they were given evidence that their client had committed perjury they
hid the perjury from the Court and actually lied in Court Documents denying the perjury.
RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL knew that the victim was entitled to his money
back, pursuant to the Florida Lemon Law, since their client's perjury was the ONLY factor that kept the victim from getting
his money back.
Yet RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL decided to be dishonest, to violate the
Rules of the Florida Bar, and to cover up the perjury by their client, by denying it, as part of a scheme to steal the victim's
money.
The management in RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL were made fully aware of
the illegal conduct of their law firm by the Disabled Veteran-Victim and THEY have remained silent, which makes them guilty
too.
RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL have a history of being "less then idea
lawyers" and the Florida Supreme Court, in a rare move, actually ORDERED an investigation of their law firm by the Florida
Bar.
RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL are investigated at the request of the Florida Supreme Court.
Law Firm of RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL are investigated in possible leak of a Florida Supreme Court Ruling
Florida Supreme Court Says Ruling Was Not Leaked, to Uphold the Intergity of their Court, HOWEVER a Settlement was Reached
Right Before the Decision Came Down, and RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL did have an Employee Receive E-Mails from an Employee
at the Florida Supreme Court
From my personal experience in dealing with the law firm of RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL
I can state that I have found them to be extremely dishonest, misusing the Florida Legal System to wrongly steal money from
me, thousands that I paid for a junk Chevy S-10.
I KNOW they lie to the Courts and cover up perjury. I KNOW they misrepresent case law, and
use legal trickery, and techinicalities to make sure JUSTICE IS NOT DONE, and to help
their client, in my case, steal in direct violation of Chapter 681.
Based on my knowledge of how dishonest RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL are I personally believe
they are not as innocent as they claim in the Supreme Court Leak.
That however is my own personal belief, based on my personally knowing that they lied, and
hid the crime of perjury in my case.
I can truthfully say that in my 56 years I have never known any company even close to
as dishonest as the law firm of RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL are, other then maybe the conduct of General Motors in this
case.
Honest Attorneys would have told their client that it is illegal to lie, under oath, and
promptly advised the Court of their client's perjury.
Honest Attorneys would have told their client to give back the money they stole.
|